222 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
222 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
.. Copyright (C) 2001-2019 NLTK Project
|
|
.. For license information, see LICENSE.TXT
|
|
|
|
=========================
|
|
Resolution Theorem Prover
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
>>> from nltk.inference.resolution import *
|
|
>>> from nltk.sem import logic
|
|
>>> from nltk.sem.logic import *
|
|
>>> logic._counter._value = 0
|
|
>>> read_expr = logic.Expression.fromstring
|
|
|
|
>>> P = read_expr('P')
|
|
>>> Q = read_expr('Q')
|
|
>>> R = read_expr('R')
|
|
>>> A = read_expr('A')
|
|
>>> B = read_expr('B')
|
|
>>> x = read_expr('x')
|
|
>>> y = read_expr('y')
|
|
>>> z = read_expr('z')
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
Test most_general_unification()
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(x, x))
|
|
{}
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(A, A))
|
|
{}
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(A, x))
|
|
{x: A}
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(x, A))
|
|
{x: A}
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(x, y))
|
|
{x: y}
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(P(x), P(A)))
|
|
{x: A}
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(P(x,B), P(A,y)))
|
|
{x: A, y: B}
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(P(x,B), P(B,x)))
|
|
{x: B}
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(P(x,y), P(A,x)))
|
|
{x: A, y: x}
|
|
>>> print(most_general_unification(P(Q(x)), P(y)))
|
|
{y: Q(x)}
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
Test unify()
|
|
------------
|
|
>>> print(Clause([]).unify(Clause([])))
|
|
[]
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(x)]).unify(Clause([-P(A)])))
|
|
[{}]
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(A), Q(x)]).unify(Clause([-P(x), R(x)])))
|
|
[{R(A), Q(A)}]
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(A), Q(x), R(x,y)]).unify(Clause([-P(x), Q(y)])))
|
|
[{Q(y), Q(A), R(A,y)}]
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(A), -Q(y)]).unify(Clause([-P(x), Q(B)])))
|
|
[{}]
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(x), Q(x)]).unify(Clause([-P(A), -Q(B)])))
|
|
[{-Q(B), Q(A)}, {-P(A), P(B)}]
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(x,x), Q(x), R(x)]).unify(Clause([-P(A,z), -Q(B)])))
|
|
[{-Q(B), Q(A), R(A)}, {-P(A,z), R(B), P(B,B)}]
|
|
|
|
>>> a = clausify(read_expr('P(A)'))
|
|
>>> b = clausify(read_expr('A=B'))
|
|
>>> print(a[0].unify(b[0]))
|
|
[{P(B)}]
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
Test is_tautology()
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(A), -P(A)]).is_tautology())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(Clause([-P(A), P(A)]).is_tautology())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(x), -P(A)]).is_tautology())
|
|
False
|
|
>>> print(Clause([Q(B), -P(A), P(A)]).is_tautology())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(Clause([-Q(A), P(R(A)), -P(R(A)), Q(x), -R(y)]).is_tautology())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(x), -Q(A)]).is_tautology())
|
|
False
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
Test subsumes()
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(A), Q(B)]).subsumes(Clause([P(A), Q(B)])))
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(Clause([-P(A)]).subsumes(Clause([P(A)])))
|
|
False
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(A), Q(B)]).subsumes(Clause([Q(B), P(A)])))
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(A), Q(B)]).subsumes(Clause([Q(B), R(A), P(A)])))
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(A), R(A), Q(B)]).subsumes(Clause([Q(B), P(A)])))
|
|
False
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(x)]).subsumes(Clause([P(A)])))
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(Clause([P(A)]).subsumes(Clause([P(x)])))
|
|
True
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
Test prove()
|
|
------------
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('man(x)')).prove())
|
|
False
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('(man(x) -> man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('(man(x) -> --man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('-(man(x) & -man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('(man(x) | -man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('(man(x) -> man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('-(man(x) & -man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('(man(x) | -man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('(man(x) -> man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('(man(x) <-> man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('-(man(x) <-> -man(x))')).prove())
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('all x.man(x)')).prove())
|
|
False
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('-all x.some y.F(x,y) & some x.all y.(-F(x,y))')).prove())
|
|
False
|
|
>>> print(ResolutionProverCommand(read_expr('some x.all y.sees(x,y)')).prove())
|
|
False
|
|
|
|
>>> p1 = read_expr('all x.(man(x) -> mortal(x))')
|
|
>>> p2 = read_expr('man(Socrates)')
|
|
>>> c = read_expr('mortal(Socrates)')
|
|
>>> ResolutionProverCommand(c, [p1,p2]).prove()
|
|
True
|
|
|
|
>>> p1 = read_expr('all x.(man(x) -> walks(x))')
|
|
>>> p2 = read_expr('man(John)')
|
|
>>> c = read_expr('some y.walks(y)')
|
|
>>> ResolutionProverCommand(c, [p1,p2]).prove()
|
|
True
|
|
|
|
>>> p = read_expr('some e1.some e2.(believe(e1,john,e2) & walk(e2,mary))')
|
|
>>> c = read_expr('some e0.walk(e0,mary)')
|
|
>>> ResolutionProverCommand(c, [p]).prove()
|
|
True
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
Test proof()
|
|
------------
|
|
>>> p1 = read_expr('all x.(man(x) -> mortal(x))')
|
|
>>> p2 = read_expr('man(Socrates)')
|
|
>>> c = read_expr('mortal(Socrates)')
|
|
>>> logic._counter._value = 0
|
|
>>> tp = ResolutionProverCommand(c, [p1,p2])
|
|
>>> tp.prove()
|
|
True
|
|
>>> print(tp.proof())
|
|
[1] {-mortal(Socrates)} A
|
|
[2] {-man(z2), mortal(z2)} A
|
|
[3] {man(Socrates)} A
|
|
[4] {-man(Socrates)} (1, 2)
|
|
[5] {mortal(Socrates)} (2, 3)
|
|
[6] {} (1, 5)
|
|
<BLANKLINE>
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
Question Answering
|
|
------------------
|
|
One answer
|
|
>>> p1 = read_expr('father_of(art,john)')
|
|
>>> p2 = read_expr('father_of(bob,kim)')
|
|
>>> p3 = read_expr('all x.all y.(father_of(x,y) -> parent_of(x,y))')
|
|
>>> c = read_expr('all x.(parent_of(x,john) -> ANSWER(x))')
|
|
>>> logic._counter._value = 0
|
|
>>> tp = ResolutionProverCommand(None, [p1,p2,p3,c])
|
|
>>> sorted(tp.find_answers())
|
|
[<ConstantExpression art>]
|
|
>>> print(tp.proof()) # doctest: +SKIP
|
|
[1] {father_of(art,john)} A
|
|
[2] {father_of(bob,kim)} A
|
|
[3] {-father_of(z3,z4), parent_of(z3,z4)} A
|
|
[4] {-parent_of(z6,john), ANSWER(z6)} A
|
|
[5] {parent_of(art,john)} (1, 3)
|
|
[6] {parent_of(bob,kim)} (2, 3)
|
|
[7] {ANSWER(z6), -father_of(z6,john)} (3, 4)
|
|
[8] {ANSWER(art)} (1, 7)
|
|
[9] {ANSWER(art)} (4, 5)
|
|
<BLANKLINE>
|
|
|
|
Multiple answers
|
|
>>> p1 = read_expr('father_of(art,john)')
|
|
>>> p2 = read_expr('mother_of(ann,john)')
|
|
>>> p3 = read_expr('all x.all y.(father_of(x,y) -> parent_of(x,y))')
|
|
>>> p4 = read_expr('all x.all y.(mother_of(x,y) -> parent_of(x,y))')
|
|
>>> c = read_expr('all x.(parent_of(x,john) -> ANSWER(x))')
|
|
>>> logic._counter._value = 0
|
|
>>> tp = ResolutionProverCommand(None, [p1,p2,p3,p4,c])
|
|
>>> sorted(tp.find_answers())
|
|
[<ConstantExpression ann>, <ConstantExpression art>]
|
|
>>> print(tp.proof()) # doctest: +SKIP
|
|
[ 1] {father_of(art,john)} A
|
|
[ 2] {mother_of(ann,john)} A
|
|
[ 3] {-father_of(z3,z4), parent_of(z3,z4)} A
|
|
[ 4] {-mother_of(z7,z8), parent_of(z7,z8)} A
|
|
[ 5] {-parent_of(z10,john), ANSWER(z10)} A
|
|
[ 6] {parent_of(art,john)} (1, 3)
|
|
[ 7] {parent_of(ann,john)} (2, 4)
|
|
[ 8] {ANSWER(z10), -father_of(z10,john)} (3, 5)
|
|
[ 9] {ANSWER(art)} (1, 8)
|
|
[10] {ANSWER(z10), -mother_of(z10,john)} (4, 5)
|
|
[11] {ANSWER(ann)} (2, 10)
|
|
[12] {ANSWER(art)} (5, 6)
|
|
[13] {ANSWER(ann)} (5, 7)
|
|
<BLANKLINE>
|
|
|