136 lines
5.2 KiB
Python
136 lines
5.2 KiB
Python
# Chomsky random text generator, version 1.1, Raymond Hettinger, 2005/09/13
|
|
# http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/440546
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
CHOMSKY is an aid to writing linguistic papers in the style
|
|
of the great master. It is based on selected phrases taken
|
|
from actual books and articles written by Noam Chomsky.
|
|
Upon request, it assembles the phrases in the elegant
|
|
stylistic patterns that Chomsky is noted for.
|
|
To generate n sentences of linguistic wisdom, type
|
|
|
|
(CHOMSKY n) -- for example
|
|
(CHOMSKY 5) generates half a screen of linguistic truth.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
leadins = """To characterize a linguistic level L,
|
|
On the other hand,
|
|
This suggests that
|
|
It appears that
|
|
Furthermore,
|
|
We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis:
|
|
To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K),
|
|
From C1, it follows that
|
|
For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in \
|
|
application to be of any interest,
|
|
Analogously,
|
|
Clearly,
|
|
Note that
|
|
Of course,
|
|
Suppose, for instance, that
|
|
Thus
|
|
With this clarification,
|
|
Conversely,
|
|
We have already seen that
|
|
By combining adjunctions and certain deformations,
|
|
I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that
|
|
If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively \
|
|
inaccessible to movement,
|
|
However, this assumption is not correct, since
|
|
Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in \
|
|
(96) and (97), we see that
|
|
In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81),
|
|
So far,
|
|
Nevertheless,
|
|
For one thing,
|
|
Summarizing, then, we assume that
|
|
A consequence of the approach just outlined is that
|
|
Presumably,
|
|
On our assumptions,
|
|
It may be, then, that
|
|
It must be emphasized, once again, that
|
|
Let us continue to suppose that
|
|
Notice, incidentally, that """
|
|
# List of LEADINs to buy time.
|
|
|
|
subjects = """ the notion of level of grammaticalness
|
|
a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort
|
|
most of the methodological work in modern linguistics
|
|
a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds
|
|
the natural general principle that will subsume this case
|
|
an important property of these three types of EC
|
|
any associated supporting element
|
|
the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible \
|
|
to ordinary extraction
|
|
the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition
|
|
the descriptive power of the base component
|
|
the earlier discussion of deviance
|
|
this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features
|
|
this selectionally introduced contextual feature
|
|
a descriptively adequate grammar
|
|
the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial
|
|
relational information
|
|
the systematic use of complex symbols
|
|
the theory of syntactic features developed earlier"""
|
|
# List of SUBJECTs chosen for maximum professorial macho.
|
|
|
|
verbs = """can be defined in such a way as to impose
|
|
delimits
|
|
suffices to account for
|
|
cannot be arbitrary in
|
|
is not subject to
|
|
does not readily tolerate
|
|
raises serious doubts about
|
|
is not quite equivalent to
|
|
does not affect the structure of
|
|
may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate
|
|
is not to be considered in determining
|
|
is to be regarded as
|
|
is unspecified with respect to
|
|
is, apparently, determined by
|
|
is necessary to impose an interpretation on
|
|
appears to correlate rather closely with
|
|
is rather different from"""
|
|
# List of VERBs chosen for autorecursive obfuscation.
|
|
|
|
objects = """ problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.
|
|
a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined \
|
|
by the paired utterance test.
|
|
the traditional practice of grammarians.
|
|
the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual \
|
|
gibberish (e.g. (98d)).
|
|
a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.
|
|
a descriptive fact.
|
|
a parasitic gap construction.
|
|
the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).
|
|
the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.
|
|
the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.
|
|
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.
|
|
nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.
|
|
a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.
|
|
an abstract underlying order.
|
|
an important distinction in language use.
|
|
the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance \
|
|
scope of a complex symbol.
|
|
the strong generative capacity of the theory."""
|
|
# List of OBJECTs selected for profound sententiousness.
|
|
|
|
import textwrap, random
|
|
from itertools import chain, islice
|
|
|
|
from six.moves import zip
|
|
|
|
|
|
def generate_chomsky(times=5, line_length=72):
|
|
parts = []
|
|
for part in (leadins, subjects, verbs, objects):
|
|
phraselist = list(map(str.strip, part.splitlines()))
|
|
random.shuffle(phraselist)
|
|
parts.append(phraselist)
|
|
output = chain(*islice(zip(*parts), 0, times))
|
|
print(textwrap.fill(" ".join(output), line_length))
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
generate_chomsky()
|